Skip to main content

Credit Cards - Past, Present & Future

Credit Cards 101, 201, 301 & 401!

Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19credit.html?em

Dealing Consumers a New Hand in Credit Cards
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/your-money/20money.html?hp
By RON LIEBER
Published: May 19, 2009

"
If you don’t like the new fees and other things that banks will soon be testing as they grapple with their new economic reality, then make some noise. Send a note to me at rlieber@nytimes.com, so I can write about the latest foolishness — or consumer-friendly twist. At the very least, all of our complaints to the higher-ups at the banks may help persuade the companies to head in another direction. "

What Does Your Credit-Card Company Know About You?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/magazine/17credit-t.html?hpw

[Originally posted on my personal blog at muralikd.blogspot.com, May 19, 2009]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Citibank's junk mail opt-out is like jumping through hoops

I have a Citibank NRI (non-resident Indian) account which I don' t use much. But I get a ton of email from them - all marketing messages. I tried "unsubscribing" (still trying to figure out how can you unsubscribe when you didn't subscribe).

The reply I got back from Citibank shows their callous attitude towards their customers and particularly regarding the issue of spam:

From: India Service [mailto:indiaservice@citicorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 8:39 AM
To: Murali Krishna Devarakonda
Subject: RE:'Citibank=006-038-728' Unsubscribe
Dear Mr. Devarakonda,

This is with reference to your email dated September 25, 2007.
To withdraw the promotion mailer facility, we require the Coupon A form. The form is available in the nearest NRI centre.
The list of NRI Centers are available in the 'Contact Us' under the "customer service" option in our website www.citinri.com.
We assure you of our best attention at all times.

Warm Regards,
Officer - Custo…

Sex, Rape, and God

There's an interesting article in Washington Post that discusses the nuances and history of Mormon polygamy. I found the comments below it sufficiently compelling to respond. I'm reproducing here what I said there:

All this talk about what the religion or the sect says is a red herring in my view. The only issue is what is legal, and what should be illegal.

The core problem with this incident and others before it isn't whether polygamy is or should be legal.

* The problem is adults having sex with children *
* The problem is _systemic_ RAPE of children. *

No society should condone in any form sex with children.

Polygamy, Polyandry, Polyamory, Bigamy and any kind of sexual union between *consenting adults* is not the issue, and shouldn't be illegal in the first place.

The problem is that laws exist on books in several US states that make these various kinds of sexual activity illegal - including fellatio and sodomy - even between consenting adults.

Updating our legal s…